© 2023 Prancer Enterprise


Challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and manual penetration testing

February 7, 2022

The biggest challenge with manual vulnerability assessments and penetration testing is that it’s slow, expensive, and doesn’t scale with modern CI/CD strategies. It can take weeks or even months to find and exploit all the vulnerabilities in a system. And it’s challenging for security teams to keep up with the ever-changing landscape of security threats.

The first challenge is about the penetration testing coverage. Security penetration testers can only test what they know and see. They need to be aware of all the potential vulnerabilities in order to exploit them. But with new security threats emerging every day, it’s impossible for penetration testers to know everything.

The second challenge is about the accuracy of the findings in penetration testing results. Usually, there are lots of false positives and true negatives in the findings of penetration testers. This is because penetration testers can only test the reachable attack surface that they see and know. It’s impossible for them to exploit every possible vulnerable endpoint in a system. And it’s also difficult for penetration testers to understand how an application works in its code level, so it’s easy for them to have lots of false positives or true negatives in their findings.

The next challenge for manual penetration testing is triage validation of the results. Security teams need to verify all the findings and prioritize which ones are critical so they can be fixed. This is a very time-consuming process that takes lots of effort from security professionals. And it’s difficult for them to prioritize based on their knowledge and experience.

The last challenge with manual testing which we want to talk about here is CI/CD integration. It is not possible to integrate testing to application developers pipeline and create an automated system out of that. Penetration testers need to manually review and validate the findings from their testing results which is not possible to automate.


In Prancer, manual vulnerability assessments and penetration testing can be time-consuming, costly, and often produce inconsistent results. With the increasing complexity and prevalence of cyber threats, these manual approaches may not be sufficient for ensuring the security of critical data and systems. By utilizing automated testing tools like Prancer’s solution, organizations can simulate a variety of attacks and identify vulnerabilities more quickly, accurately, and cost-effectively. Automated penetration testing is a critical tool for organizations to maintain a strong security posture, protect against potential cyber threats, and comply with regulatory requirements.

These are the top six challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. We hope you enjoyed this post!